Remix.run Logo
12381231927 2 days ago

At this point, why don't we just do a prequel to the release?

1) Astra will win all benchmarks like all models do.

2) The pelican will have a basket with a fish.

3) Cyber is too dangerous to release.

4) It can finally construct the set of all sets.

bogzz 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

It also has to do something naughty, preferably in a menacing swarm.

cousinbryce 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

That won’t happen until the week before DEF CON

spwa4 2 days ago | parent [-]

At this point nobody will be impressed unless the posters for DEF CON have "pre-hacked by ChatGPT. The nukes are counting down" written on them.

kelseyfrog 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Something something nation-state level capabilities.

vonneumannstan 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Honestly I find these cavalier statements to be in incredibly poor taste. Unless you are completely blind it's obvious that AI is the most significant piece of technology invented since the Atomic Bomb and could very well be the most important thing ever built by Humans full stop. This kind of dismissive attitude is childish and will likely lead to incredibly bad outcomes for humanity.

roarcher 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

Even if all that is true, why shouldn't people be able to joke about it? Your sentiment is borderline AI worship.

vonneumannstan 2 days ago | parent [-]

I don't think they were joking.

WelkinFolk a day ago | parent [-]

Sarcastic quips are basically the most human response to any new situation. Let us have fun

Planktonne 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The atomic bomb destroyed cities and changed the face of war.

The launch video for Astra has 'can upload a photo to Ebay' as a highlight.

2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]
[deleted]
dgellow 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Please tell me that’s satire, it’s literally impossible to differentiate from actual AI boosters

vonneumannstan 2 days ago | parent [-]

You have blinders on. AI is becoming more dangerous by the day.

dgellow 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

I’m on HN almost every day advocating for a complete ban of the technology because of its risks and externalities…

vonneumannstan 2 days ago | parent [-]

Then why are we arguing? I agree with you, I'm highlighting the fact that people making light of the technology is dangerous

dgellow a day ago | parent [-]

I’m not the one arguing, I asked you if your comment was satire. I agree with the sibling comment, it reads like AI religious worshipping

pixl97 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Sorry the open sourcers cannot ever come to that believe as it sets up a conflict that cannot be resolved by their moral framework. Exactly like libertarians saying "just a little less regulation and we'll reach utopia".

2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]
[deleted]
kelseyfrog 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Yes, but precisely because it's capable of producing the economic equivalent of a nuclear explosion.

tomrod 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

[flagged]

quotemstr 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

5) Otherwise-sober people on X will say "oh my god i was a doubter before but now it's real omg" before the new model smell wears off and they realize the new thing is stupid in ways models have been generally stupid

6) accusations of quantized serving after new model smell wears off and people see the new thing making mistakes

gchamonlive 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

> 4) It can finally construct the set of all sets.

lazily of course:

A = {x | x ∈ A} ∪ {A}