| ▲ | lxgr 2 hours ago | |
It’s not nearly just cookies, and I think interpreting domain hierarchies as administrative structure generally does make sense. Maybe it could be opt-in or opt-out via some markers at the DNS level, though? The public suffix list having to exist at all is bizarre. | ||
| ▲ | amluto 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
An “administrative structure” seems fine, but the fact that a subdomain gets any sort of privilege over the parent has always seemed absurd to me. Surely a better solution would involve an actual request. login.foo.com could send a request to foo.com with Origin: login.foo.com asking to set a cookie, and foo.com could make its own decision. | ||
| ▲ | markhahn 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
that seems strange to me: why shouldn't policy leverage name resolution? sort of like dkim, but taken further. for instance, for site.com, I'd much rather retrieve its public key from DNS (some DNS++ version, of course). | ||