> There is likely too much crime in urban areas for children to walk freely

This is very much not true. If there are any urban areas that have too much crime for kids to walk freely, it's a vanishingly small percentage, and certainly does not include gated communities in Williamsburg, VA.

GTFOH with that nonsense.

▲

Huarache1 3 days ago | parent [-]

That's why I said it was a harsh sentence for a probably safe area at the end of my statement, why so angry?

▲

mcphage 3 days ago | parent [-]

Because even beyond this area being safe, your claim that "There is likely too much crime in urban areas for children to walk freely" is wrong.

▲

Huarache1 2 days ago | parent [-]

I would argue it depends on where. Most of the rural areas are likely too loosely populated to commit any serious crimes, especially against children. And it is a large part of the United States.

However, looking at say, Downtown Los Angeles, Chicago, New York, the amount of crime does seem to increase overall. This is partially due to density, and also poverty. Saint Louis, a good chunk of Louisiana, parts of the South (Not including Texas), the Appalachian region, a good chunk of the Eastern United States barring New England, many of these regions have had issues with crime.

There's also the issue of crime happening in schools, including but not limited to drug sales (mostly between teenagers and not generally violent), and shootings (which is rare but far more common compared to other similarly wealthy nations).

Also I said Sometimes the Adults are scared due to truths, and exaggerations.

	▲	mcphage 2 days ago \| parent [-]
		> Also I said Sometimes the Adults are scared due to truths, and exaggerations. The "adult scared due to exaggerations" in this situation is you.