Wow, they were extremely laziest in the request form too. Most answers are just a few words.

  > 3.6. Have you communicated with any of the entities whose products or services might be affected...
  > "No. Not applicable."

▲ mchesters 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Seriously.

  > 7.3. Provide any other relevant information to include with the request. If none, respond with “N/A.”
  > None.

▲ fetzu 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Also note that their response is the exact length of the shortest allowed one, and yet still wrong.

▲ chrismorgan 3 hours ago | parent [-]

I want to hear you justify, with perfect gravity, “N/A.” being the exact same length as “None.” Pictures of handwriting or specific fonts accepted. :D

	▲	johntash 3 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		It's _almost_ the same length if you count the period on "N/A." but not on "None."
	▲	fwlr an hour ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		`N . / A . N o n e .`

▲ chrismorgan 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I think the “not applicable” is to the elided second sentence of the question:

> 3.6. Have you communicated with any of the entities whose products or services might be affected by the introduction of your proposed service? [→ No.] If so, please describe the communications. [→ Not applicable.]

Gotta say that the entire form feels not applicable. The proposed service is the discontinuation of an existing service. I see from their website that other similar things do the same, but it feels broken when so many of the questions become nonsense.

▲ wmf 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

This is how you fill out an application when you know it's going to be rubber-stamped.

	▲	xp84 42 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		Bingo. They just do whatever they want, and cash our checks.

▲ MadameMinty 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

The nerve.