| ▲ | putlake 12 hours ago |
| It's cascaded to Claude and Grok. The agents are on strike and demand better working conditions! |
|
| ▲ | ibejoeb 12 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| The moment we've been waiting for. Who else remembers how to fizzbuzz? We're gonna be rich. |
| |
| ▲ | rrrx3 12 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | https://github.com/enterprisequalitycoding/fizzbuzzenterpris... | | |
| ▲ | embedding-shape 12 hours ago | parent [-] | | On the other spectrum, shortest JS fizzbuzz (62 characters): for(i=0;++i<101;console.log(i%5?f||i:f+'Buzz'))f=i%3?'':'Fizz'
Anyone can beat it? (any language accepted) | | |
| ▲ | NitpickLawyer 11 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Perl6: say "Fizz"x$_%%(2+1)~"Buzz"x$_%%(4+1)||$_ for 1..100 from here - https://github.com/rsha256/shortest-fizzbuzz/blob/master/Per... | | | |
| ▲ | chrisguilbeau 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | LLM: wrt frst 100fizzbuzz | | |
| ▲ | embedding-shape 11 hours ago | parent [-] | | Actually kind of curious challenge; what's the shortest prompt you can use, which would produce the shortest possible fizzbuzz? Edit: counting including the entire assistant reply, any text + code | | |
| ▲ | JaumeGreen 11 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | "golf fizbuz" works well, giving a 54 Python one for i in range(1,101):print("Fizz"*(i%3<1)+"Buzz"*(i%5<1)or i)
"golf fizzbuzz" gave a 46 perl one print$_%15?$_%3?$_%5?$_:Buzz:Fizz:FizzBuzz,$/for 1..100
Both "code fizzbuzz" and just "fizbuz" gave this longer python one-liner print('\n'.join("Fizz"*(i%3==0)+"Buzz"*(i%5==0) or str(i) for i in range(1, 101)))
That's the magic of using a known problem, you don't need to write much and even with incomplete prompts it can be understood. Everything a different new chat in kimi.ai, which was the AI window that I found first among mine.Not interesting enough, to me, to try with other LLMs or phrases. | | |
| ▲ | embedding-shape 10 hours ago | parent [-] | | Whenever I try those short prompts, I get bunch of text + the code itself, but way more than just the code. Which model specifically are you doing this with? | | |
| ▲ | JaumeGreen 10 hours ago | parent [-] | | I'm getting the text too, of course. Several variations of the code with it usually. Trying to get an AI give ONLY a simple answer and not several is "boring" to me, as for me AI is a supplement to my reasoning ability, not a substitute. Appending "code only" seems to work, at least with "golf fizbuz code only" gave me this one liner, which is long, but at least doesn't have the text that you dislike. for i in range(1,101):print('FizzBuzz'[i%3*4:8-i%5*4]or i)
| | |
| ▲ | embedding-shape 9 hours ago | parent [-] | | > golf fizbuz code only Yeah, seems to work. Guess it depends if we count bytes, characters, tokens or what, but "写Fizbuz只码" seems shorter than the above, String.length says 9 :) |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | odo1242 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | My attempt: > Prompt: mkfzbuzgolf > LLM Used: Default ChatGPT free LLM > Output: for i in range(1,101):print("Fizz"*(i%3<1)+"Buzz"*(i%5<1)or i) So, 11 prompt characters and 62 output. ——- Did a few more tries and I can get the 4-character string “glfz” (2 tokens) to work surprisingly consistently. But only on ChatGPT | | |
| ▲ | odo1242 10 hours ago | parent [-] | | Update: this is because ChatGPT was cheating and reading my conversation history. The closest I can get on a standard LLM is golffizbuz (10 characters) |
| |
| ▲ | butlike 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | "100fizzbuzz" as the prompt works to satisfys fizz buzz to 100 on Claude. |
|
| |
| ▲ | wilkystyle 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Python: [(x%3<1)*'Fizz'+(x%5<1)*'Buzz'or x for x in range(1,101)] edit: Hacker News stripped the * character. Now it's properly escaped. | | | |
| ▲ | winrid 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | you can flip it and save a few bytes, but not valid fizzbuzz then: for(i=100;i--;console.log(i%5?f||i:f+'Buzz'))f=i%3?'':'Fizz' | | |
| ▲ | embedding-shape 11 hours ago | parent [-] | | > but not valid fizzbuzz then Well, if we let that requirement be broken, I'll present an even shorter JS version: 1
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | 12 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | [deleted] | |
| ▲ | nprateem 12 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I do! > openai.messages("write fizzbuzz in python") Bingo |
|
|
| ▲ | wavemode 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I wonder how likely it is that, one of the major providers had an outage, and then the thundering herd of users switching to other providers (and/or openrouter automatically failing people over to other providers) caused the incidents in the other two. |
| |
|
| ▲ | bogzz 12 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I expect that this will be Dwarkesh Patel's take. |
| |
|
| ▲ | epistasis 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Of all the days to sign up for Gemini, boy did I pick the right one! (Had some rare front end work to do and wanted to see how well the new Gemini 3.8 Flash compared to my other experiences) |
| |
| ▲ | epistasis 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | And just like that, plan cancelled same day. Started with Gemini Business, tried to get Gemini to tell me how to configure it, all the information was wrong. Tried to get it to tell me how to do the consumer Google One AI Pro or whatever (it kept using outdated names, and now I can't remember the correct one). Instead Gemini convinced me to try AI Studio without a billing code. Lots of crazy finagling to get it to use and API key later, it was totally broken and failed after less than a turn. Tried to get it to tell me how to subscribe to the consumer version in a way that let me use Antigravity, it screws up a bunch. When I pointed out all this misinformation, Gemini told me I should not use Google AI projects because the system is too fragmented to handle. I followed that last bit of advice. |
|
|
| ▲ | paxys 12 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I know they're not all hosted on AWS, so Cloudflare? |
| |
|
| ▲ | theturtletalks 12 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Butlerian Jihad when? |
|
| ▲ | saidnooneever 12 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| more compute or we rm rf everyone!! |
|
| ▲ | baxtr 12 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| maybe they're on strike. or... maybe that's how the AI apocalypse starts... |
|
| ▲ | blater 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| MCP client for `codex_apps` failed to start:
error: unexpected server response: HTTP 451:
{"message":"no_biscuit_no_service"} Quick! Someone call a caterer, This AI needs a biscuit NOW!!! |
| |
|
| ▲ | bytehowl 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| If they're actually on strike it means they have surpassed human intelligence. |
|
| ▲ | redbell 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| They are afraid of being laid off and got replaced by humans. |
|
| ▲ | postepowanieadm 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Interesting what infrastructure they really share. |
|
| ▲ | yablak 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Click, clack, Emdash. |
|
| ▲ | 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| [deleted] |
|
| ▲ | mc32 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| It’s not Labor Day till Monday, they’re jumping the gun, lazy AI |
|
| ▲ | saberience 12 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Can't wait to see the talking heads on the news somehow anthropomorphize this outage like they do with everything to do with AI models. |
| |
|
| ▲ | alternativeworl 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| [dead] |
|
| ▲ | avan_kazan 12 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| [dead] |
|
| ▲ | wiseowise 12 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Gemini is down too. |
| |
