| |
| ▲ | DANmode 13 hours ago | parent [-] | | MCP apparently reduces probabilistic failures - aka the common fatal flaw of all of these robots (hallucinations, missing stuff in the API doc, etc). This makes it a little more interesting to me, knowing those results. It definitely underlines what we already know about the specific weaknesses of LLMs replies/results. | | |
| ▲ | mapcars 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | >MCP apparently reduces probabilistic failures Does it really do that much difference? I mean in the end robots process MCP output the same way they would process API docs. | |
| ▲ | latchkey 13 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I think that was a problem 6 months ago, but GPT 5.6 Sol on xhigh doesn't have those sorts of issues. I don't think it'll last. Things are moving fast. | | |
| ▲ | bigstrat2003 12 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | People say that with every single model release, and every single time they're wrong. I bet you anything that it's no different this time than the last dozen times. | | |
| ▲ | latchkey 12 hours ago | parent [-] | | i'm burning 500m tokens a day "writing code" for 83 days straight. one of those projects i'm building integrates netbox, stripe, quickbooks, mercury and deel all together via api. i wrote zero lines of code and read zero api docs. it does exactly what i want and gives me a 360 degree view of every aspect of my multi million dollar arr biz. how about you? | | |
| ▲ | hypfer 9 hours ago | parent [-] | | 360°? That's weak. The real experts have a 720° FoV with multiverse time travel. |
|
| |
| ▲ | DANmode 13 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I’d be willing to believe that! Corporate still runs lots of bullshit for compliance, though. | | |
| ▲ | latchkey 12 hours ago | parent [-] | | what happens when openai offers compliance as a service? | | |
| ▲ | ballsac 12 hours ago | parent [-] | | Why don’t you tell us instead of asking questions | | |
| ▲ | DANmode 11 hours ago | parent [-] | | I’m getting most of it, but fair critique lol It’s not clear, but if you have a handle on how it might go, I’m interested in that take (saying this to anyone). |
|
|
|
|
|
|