I think young exposure to real computers (where you create, and have to figure things out; not consumption machines) provides access to a level of fluency that is otherwise difficult or impossible to achieve, just like many other skills (language, music...)

▲

orwin 3 days ago | parent | next [-]

I'm pretty sure we ran these experiments in France in the late 80s/early 90s, it was pretty clear that exposure to real computers was useless in elementary school, and even in middle school technology teachers weren't a big fans of teaching computer skills before 14 (basically around the same time as they taught tin soldering).

▲

protimewaster 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I think that can be done without having them sit in front of a computer or even really using a computer, though. Lots of kids have stories about wandering over to a college campus when they were in middle school, wandering into a room with the keypunch machines, and learning about computers that way. Very few of those kids directly used a computer, but they learned it anyway.

▲

anonymars 2 days ago | parent [-]

How prevalent do you think are children that live within wandering distance of a college that lets random children enter and use their computers?

	▲	protimewaster 2 days ago \| parent [-]
		Colleges with key punches? Probably pretty close to zero. My point was more that, I think it's incorrect to assert that it's necessary for kids to directly use a computer in order to effectively learn about them. We have tons of concrete evidence of kids learning to be excellent at programming and understanding computers without directly using one. It happened with the kids I described.

▲

SoftTalker 3 days ago | parent | prev [-]

So give your kid an Apple-II or TRS-80 then?