What conspiracy mate? It's not so deep, I was curious if what he said was a lie due to the downvotes and found nice evidence for it. You don't find it convincing it's your choice, but the dude didn't pull it out of his ass.

▲

strictnein 3 hours ago | parent [-]

The conspiracy that Google is protected on high because people have rotated between two giant employers.

If you think it is "nice evidence", how many people should have moved between those two employers?

And you made the claim that the rate likely drastically increased over the past 10 years. Based on what, exactly?

	▲	JMiao 2 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		yes, such has been the reality for some time now. look at boeing
	▲	ux266478 3 hours ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		You think that giant employers being protected, especially when they align themselves with government interests of the day, is a conspiracy? Do you also think that suggesting economic producer interests are a high priority is a conspiracy? Or that corporations with contracts to the government are generally compliant with governmental requests?
	▲	watwut 3 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Big companies being protected "from high" based on payments and favors is not conspiracy theory anymore. It is out there in the open expected thing.