It's possible that there could be an entirely different charge mechanism that works exactly like ours but they don't interact at all; but the whole premise of dark matter is that it doesn't seem to have any self-interaction outside of gravity.

▲

gizmo686 4 hours ago | parent [-]

The premise of dark matter is that it is something with gravity that does not otherwise interact with any of our detectors (e.g. "normal" matter); or that any such interactions are weak enough that it is plausible we have not noticed.

By itself, that does not exclude the possibility of dark matter having other interactions which do not interfere with our detectors.

▲

stouset an hour ago | parent | next [-]

Our observations are much more consistent with a form of dark matter which does not self-interact, or which does so incredibly weakly.

Don’t ask me how or why, but this is essentially the universal (pun intended) consensus amongst cosmologists.

	▲	terminalbraid an hour ago \| parent [-]
		That doesn't rule out "dark matter having other interactions which do not interfere with our detectors" Dark sector theories which include other dark particles or new particle interactions are not controversial amongst cosmologists in this space. For example there's a whole area of study around "dark photons" which would mix with our photons and interact with dark matter.

▲

hyperhello 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I guess so. If you could sort of measure the dark matter distribution, there might be a structure under it, but strictly speaking isn’t it limited to saying it’s not at least likely to emit light but does have mass.

▲

XorNot 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

But it does bound it: if dark matter has self-interactions then the apparent distribution would be different. Regular matter forms stars and galaxies and all the structures we see because it can self-interact.

Since where we see dark matter mass shadows we don't see structure formation, what self interaction it may have must be very, very limited.