| ▲ | mhitza an hour ago | |
That is where their responsibility ends in terms of the EU AI Act. And that is fine and how it should be, no secret watermarks. | ||
| ▲ | a3w a minute ago | parent | next [-] | |
Watermarks can even be removed, "if substantially proofread" in the EU, law says (for now. There might be a transition period on that). For the text from an LLM, that you verify to be as true as if you wrote it yourself. Not clear if making watermarks removable is a may, shall, or should, according to legislation. It certainly is not a must. | ||
| ▲ | a3w 3 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
Watermarks cane even be removed, "if substantially proofread" in the EU, law says. For the text from an LLM, that you verify to be as true as if you wrote it yourself. Not clear is this is a may, shall, or should. It certainly is not a must. | ||
| ▲ | a3w 4 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Watermarks should even be removable "if substantially proofread or altered" in the EU for the text from an LLM, that you verify to be as true as if you wrote it yourself. Not clear is this is a may, shall, or should. It certainly is not a must. | ||