Nah it was an egregiously bad call by itself, and then the slow-mo VAR was used to justify it which is also against their own rules. So they corrected a mistake that could have severely impacted the result and integrity of the rest of the games.

But yeah, people got upset...

▲

kabes 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Doesn't matter. There's constant bad calls being made by referees. It shouldn't be, but their humans and make mistakes and it's part of the game. But only the mistake against the US got corrected.

▲

petcat 2 hours ago | parent [-]

How are we explaining Ronaldo not being required to serve his remaining 2-match suspensions at the start of the games?

▲

charlieyu1 an hour ago | parent [-]

Same, FIFA is just corrupt.

▲

petcat an hour ago | parent [-]

Okay so then we are agreeing that FIFA, a European institution, is a deeply corrupt, inconsistent, and unprincipled governing body.

But somehow this was the fault of the US?

▲

pasc1878 an hour ago | parent | next [-]

FIFA is NOT a European institution it is the global one.

The European football institution is UEFA which has complained about things like this and is also trying to remove Infantino – but the rest of the world has been bribed enough to keep him on.

▲

petcat an hour ago | parent [-]

Fifa is a European legal entity, right? headquartered in Switzerland?

▲

charlieyu1 33 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

Conversations like this make me want more gatekeeping especially for football. Some people just don’t have respect to customs and traditional practices and the actual untouchables.

To not to sway too far away, well technically yes. However all 55 UEFA members threathened to quit FIFA after Infanito’s plan to privatise the World Cup. It was just last month. And we all know who is behind this.

▲

triceratops an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

Does that make the UN American?

▲

petcat 43 minutes ago | parent [-]

Is the UN a private organization legally incorporated in the US? The way that FIFA is in Europe/Switzerland?

▲

triceratops 39 minutes ago | parent [-]

Would FIFA be less corrupt if it were legally incorporated somewhere else?

I didn't know registering an entity in another place automatically changed the character of the people that run it. That's magic. Literally mind-control.

▲

petcat 27 minutes ago | parent [-]

The point is that FIFA is a corrupt European institution and that has nothing to do with the US.

But maybe you're trying to make a No True Scotsman argument.

	▲	triceratops 13 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		> The point is that FIFA is a corrupt European institution It has "international" right there in the name. The vast majority of its members are not "European" in any sense. Calling it "European" is offensive to those members and to the footballing world as a whole. It reeks of a colonial attitude. I'll ask you again: what actually affects how an organization runs? The place that it's registered in, or the people in charge? FIFA has to be registered somewhere for legal reasons. That doesn't make it of that place. > But maybe you're trying to make a No True Scotsman argument. If FIFA were registered in the Caymans would you call it a Caymanian organization?

▲

hgoel an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

FIFA is a deeply corrupt institution (IDK if they count as specifically European, but if they do, it doesn't change the fact that they're corrupt). The US government is also deeply corrupt.