I work on a C++ codebase. I frequently prototype in c and then have the ai model slopify it back to c++. Nice b/c I am faster at reading c, but hard b/c you miss some of the features/nuances of c++.

▲ aka-rider 4 days ago | parent | next [-]

I would be afraid to do this with C++.

My friend once sent me a snippet, maybe 10 lines of C+++, asking "can you spot the UB?".

So I'm staring at these 10 lines, I KNOW there is an UB. I wasn't able to find it without a hint.

▲ tstenner 4 days ago | parent [-]

Was it the one with the elided null check?

▲ aka-rider 3 days ago | parent [-]

I don't remember the details, roughly it was unexpected invocation of move semantic, causing use after free in a loop.

My all-time favourite example is (again, my memory, I may be a bit wrong):

    for (int i = 0; i < (size_t)limit; ++i) {
    }

at some point limit could potentially become greater than INT_MAX, the compiler decided that i<limit could never be true because that would cause signed int overflow which is UB, so it "optimized" the loop into

   while(true)

signed unsigned mismatch makes me shiver

▲

dgrunwald 3 days ago | parent [-]

The compiler cannot optimize that into `while(true)` because the original code does not encounter undefined behavior when `limit` is small enough to fit into `int`. What it can do: infer that `limit <= INT_MAX` and use that to optimize the code following after the loop (and in some cases, even the code before the loop).

	▲	aka-rider 3 days ago \| parent [-]
		This isn't complete example. I don't remember the details unfortunately. But somehow compiler has decided that i <= limit is always true.

▲ itemize123 3 days ago | parent | prev [-]

interesting, c -> c++ transition should be smooth though