| ▲ | iLoveOncall 6 hours ago |
| > I think one important distinction is at least they have some humility to admit they were wrong. I'd be amazed to see a source proving that statement. There's never been a retraction around the AGI claims for example as far as I'm aware. |
|
| ▲ | sarjann 6 hours ago | parent [-] |
| I can't find a counter to every statement they have made and not sure about your specific AGI claim but. https://www.youtube.com/shorts/QMhtTO3u61A
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L_ueDUrkOlQ Examples of acknowledging he was wrong |
| |
| ▲ | iLoveOncall 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | I only watched the first one so far but you misunderstood what he says, he doesn't admit being wrong at all, in fact he doubles down on wrong claims. | | |
| ▲ | krcz 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Interesting; he is clearly saying that they were ("as a field") "confident and wrong" to believe that "the economy would have been completely upended" by the appearance of a model as strong as GPT4. What seems to be missing, from your point of view, to consider it an admission of being wrong? | |
| ▲ | 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | [deleted] |
|
|
