Remix.run Logo
cromka 10 hours ago

Brave is even better since the ad engine is actually built in (lower level) and written in Rust if memory serves me well. And before anyone says anything about crypto: pay a small fee for Brave Origin or use it for free on Linux.

grrben 8 hours ago | parent | next [-]

$60 ain't exactly teensy.

cromka 8 hours ago | parent [-]

It's a lifetime license.

stubish 7 hours ago | parent | next [-]

'lifetime'

The last lifetime license I bought expired when the developer was bought, stopped releasing updates, and the software stopped working the next major OS upgrade. It is on a clock, and you don't know when it runs out so you can't value it.

grrben 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Yes.

cromka 8 hours ago | parent [-]

60 USD for a lifetime license for software is a lot in 2026? For a browser that's arguably the fastest, most lightweight, privacy oriented and with best AdBlock available?

catlikesshrimp 5 hours ago | parent [-]

This is arguably a sales pitch

28 minutes ago | parent | next [-]
[deleted]
cromka 26 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

How so?

bigyabai 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> pay a small fee for Brave Origin

"Hey, we recognize that normal Brave is exploitative and user-hostile by default. We'll fix it if you pay us $59.99 in mutual acknowledgement that you're a chump who can't install UBO."

I'm glad (and unsurprised) that Brave's vision for the web never hit the big leagues.

cromka 8 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Right, so when exactly paying a LICENSE for SOFTWARE had become EXPLOITATIVE?

bigyabai 5 hours ago | parent [-]

[dead]

PKop 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It's not their "vision for the web" it's just an attempt at funding development of the browser given they aren't an ad-network behemoth like Google. Like Kagi charging for their search engine, a company charging money directly for the product is a good idea all things considered. How do you expect them to pay their developers?

zem 8 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I don't use brave, and I'm mostly going by this comment thread, but if the free brave is user hostile by default in an attempt to steer people over to the paid brave, that's a very legitimate thing to complain about. you can't compare it to kagi.

cromka 8 hours ago | parent [-]

No one is steering towards paid version. Every for profit feature can be disabled in free version. Whoever said hostile absolutely abused that phrase to make their point. And be the judge of it yourself: try it.

bigyabai 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> How do you expect them to pay their developers?

Ethically, for one. I'll be fucked if you expect me to "donate" to a browser that thinks my friends and family deserve a lower-quality browser experience.

bethekidyouwant 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

How is it hostile? Serving you an ad when you don’t have a tab open? Literally open a tab my guy it’s free

_--__--__ 7 hours ago | parent [-]

Many opponents of Brave online are thoroughly convinced that Brave Rewards (which gives you their Ethereum coin in exchange for showing ads as OS notification) is on by default, when it isn't. They also claim that this replaces blocked ads on webpages (this may have been true very early, I didn't use Brave back then).

cute_boi 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Maintaining browser takes a lot of effort. And, fighting with google implementation takes it to whole new level. $60 is very reasonable amount as it is a lifetime license.

bigyabai 5 hours ago | parent [-]

I don't trust Brave to fight the good fight against Google. Brave wants to sell their own ads and push Web3 slop, making them an ethical tarpit with questionable motivations.

cromka 26 minutes ago | parent [-]

Web3 slop? WTF?!

gilrain 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Thanks! I had no idea they added a paid option.

This is a brilliant browser for iOS/Linux usage, and now its UI is minimal, and its settings are filled only with stuff for my benefit. It feels like the early 2000s again! This should be much more ballyhooed.