Your example rewritten in intelligent English (I was curious):

> Note: the potential for a console freeze was previously noted but ignored. handoff-4.3-done.html stated, "could not break console, but [will need fixed later if I'm wrong]."

One could imagine that a perfect writer might also append: "It could be worth looking into what caused that wrong assumption, to prevent similar cases in the future," at most.

Everything else seems to be bad attempts at relatable writing to invoke emotion (an exercise that we should really stop trying to train emotionless matrix weights to attempt).

▲

ben_w 7 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> Everything else seems to be bad attempts at relatable writing to invoke emotion (an exercise that we should really stop trying to train emotionless matrix weights to attempt).

One of the things actual science fiction got wrong: to the extent that the thing AI does can be called "understanding", emotion is not unusually difficult for them to understand.

▲

svachalek 6 hours ago | parent [-]

I think this was the biggest shock of the original ChatGPT for me. Just how completely unrobotic its voice was compared to everything we'd ever imagined in sci fi. Even that early version was also way more adept at understanding things like implication and sarcasm than any movie AI.

▲

pixelready 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Me too. Almost every Sci-Fi AI proceeds from the premise that we will make something very obviously machine and then have to train it to seem more human. I was completely caught off guard by us taking the approach of distilling all available human output into a statistical model and using it to brute-force something resembling thought and personality through sheer data processing scale.

The unsurprising part once it was clear that approach was viable, was that humans wouldn’t be able to help but anthropomorphize it. I feel like the movie Ex Machina is more relevant than ever.

	▲	ryantgtg 25 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		The "benefiting all humanity" charters were immediately demonstrated to be a ruse. The business model is to hook users into endlessly chatting with your new friend, thus increasing their sales. Yeah, it was surprising and disappointing.

▲

prollings 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I'd really rather they did talk and behave more like classic sci-fi said they would. Far less engaging and fluffy with nonsense.

	▲	cortesoft 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Have you tried asking it to respond to you like Data from star trek, or something?

▲

ted_dunning 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

It may well become a safeguard that all bots must speak in a much less inflected voice to remind us not to particularly trust them.

▲

nemetroid 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[will need to be fixed later if I'm wrong]

▲

matltc 6 hours ago | parent [-]

Appalachian dialect

	▲	acj 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		I hear this in the upper midwest occasionally, too