I'm with you, for what I usually do most models are already more than enough.

What I'm really keen on is better auto-reasoning so I don't have to constantly have the constant inner debate on which reasoning effort to pick for each task.

I seriously hate the none-low-medium-high-xhigh-max-ultra etc that we have now, with companies frequently recommending different ones on each new model release, etc.

It's apparently called Adaptive Test-Time Compute or Dynamic Test-Time Compute and companies are apparently working on it (according to some LLM :shrug:)

Adaptive reasoning is known to be an extremely hard problem to solve, though. It requires you to predict whether a certain LLM, with a certain effort level, with a certain prompt, will give you the right answer.