| ▲ | NooneAtAll3 9 hours ago |
| > as many of noted please rephrase? |
|
| ▲ | Biganon 7 hours ago | parent [-] |
| "as many have noted", I suppose. I'm always baffled at how many people write "of" instead of "have", they don't even sound the same |
| |
| ▲ | bschwindHN 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | The classic one is "should have" or "should've" to "should of" because when spoken, it really does sound similar. I don't know what the fuck people are learning in English classes these days though, or if they even still have them. | | |
| ▲ | efskap 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | They sound exactly the same to me. Wiktionary gives <should've> as /ˈʃʊdəv/, unstressed <have> as /(h)əv/ and unstressed <of> as /əv/. |
|
|