> Nerfed Fable, as many of noted it's useless

I certainly don't take AI advice from HN, but this is amazing.

Useless? Yes, the safeguards are ridiculous and obnoxious, though I can say that 5.1 greatly relaxes them (just doing a hardening of a project parallel with this comment, which 5.0 refused to do...so did Sol and Gemini, fwiw. The Gemini one is a laugh, because 3.1 pretending like it's a dangerous tool is simply ridiculous at this point), however Fable is extraordinarily useful.

It is, far and away, the most powerful programming model, in my experience. Like, crazily so. It absolutely annihilates Opus 4.6, which I mention given the incredibly weird reminiscing people are doing here.

And for that matter it humiliates Opus 5.0 as well. Opus 5 somehow seems like it's neck in neck in the major benchmarks, but there is simply no reality where that is true. Opus stumbles over everything that Fable just blazes through.

▲

tomalbrc 7 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> it humiliates Opus

???

	▲	llm_nerd 6 hours ago \| parent [-]
		It is a vastly superior model for complex, real-world coding tasks. I've constantly had Opus 5 hit road blocks where it spins in circles at xhigh, where switching to Fable immediately solves it. I've had Opus create solutions that Fable then points out the gaps and limitations with, and have never seen the opposite happen. The fantasy that Opus is superior for coding, much less the incredibly weird clutching onto some far obsolete model, is not reality based.

▲

tripleee 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[flagged]

▲

llm_nerd 8 hours ago | parent [-]

That's, uh, a great contribution. Thanks. It's super important that HN learns how this sounds like to you.

	▲	tripleee 8 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Just doing my part