> Apple argues that when trade secret information is fed into an AI agent or model that learns from it, that learning "may create irreversible and continually propagating uses of the trade secret."

Yes. Yes, please make this argument, Apple. Some fascinating other conclusions follow from this.

▲

lobf 2 days ago | parent [-]

What are you referring to?

▲

unethical_ban 2 days ago | parent [-]

That using AI to create derivative works of proprietary or copyrighted content would count as intellectual property theft.

▲

amelius 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

I'd love that, but that generalizes the argument, and it does not naturally follow that this is true.

	▲	happytoexplain 2 days ago \| parent [-]
		It doesn't strictly follow, but it very much naturally (or arguably) follows.

▲

lobf a day ago | parent | prev [-]

This is a trade secret, which is a very different category.