Nowhere does he say he built an llm. Hes using a transformer, not an llm.

embedding-shape 10 hours ago | parent [-]

> Nowhere does he say he built an llm. Hes using a transformer, not an llm.

Please describe what in your mind a "LLM" is exactly, then describe what this person is building. To me this sounds like "He's not building a calculator, he's just building a program that can do addition, minus, multiplication and division and display the results".

Obviously it's not a Large Language Model, but to me this looks more like a LLM than not, given the architecture he's chosen. But again, maybe I misunderstand?

▲

evilmathkid 9 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Its not an LLM if there's no pretraining. AR transformers were around before LLMs and will be there after LLMs.

When I made this, the point was to show that you dont need pretraining (which is what makes an LLM) to perform well on complex tasks

And yes it is not a language model either. I did not train it on any language data. Only ARC puzzles

▲

soVeryTired 9 hours ago | parent [-]

Out of interest, would you call BERT an LLM? It’s pre trained but not particularly large.

	▲	stymaar 9 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		AFAIK, the “large” qualifier came when transformers allowed to scale the size of language models compared to the recurrent models that where in fashion before. And although BERT isn't large by today's standard, it was large enough for the time.
	▲	evilmathkid 9 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		idk the definition is fuzzy. thats why people use the "modern" qualifier to talk about decoder-only style and this is also not clean since you now have reasoning models which are separate

▲

soVeryTired 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It’s neither large nor language-based. ARC-AGI-1 is grid-based and nonverbal.

Use of a transformer is not necessary or sufficient to qualify as an LLM.

▲

crotonix 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Transformer solves a Seq2Seq problem just like RNNs. All Seq2Seq problems need not involve a language. In this case teaching on ARC puzzles doesn't mean what he trained is now trained on a language which will be English(or any other language) in this case. So, does his training successfully models "English as a language" -> No. This implies it is not "Large" and has not modeled any "language".

▲

yorwba 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

A LLM should at the very least be a language model, i.e. be able to take human-readable text as input or produce it as output. Transformers are used for plenty of tasks that don't involve language, for example object detection or blind source separation, where the models aren't called LMs; and on the other hand there are some LLM architectures that exclusively use linear attention variants and aren't really transformers anymore.