Compared to 20-30kw spend on cruising the highway in a car (considerably higher for older ICEs) 1.4kw does not really seem to dent the energy consumption.

Especially if cognitive technologies mean that we need to travel less (eg communiting to work, or ineffecient supply chains).

▲

eleventen a day ago | parent [-]

What percentage of your time is spent cruising at highway speed? Presumably that one GPu would be saturated all the time.

	▲	paimapi a day ago \| parent [-]
		2-3 hours at 20kW daily (assuming commute, etc) vs 20ish hours always on tasks really is close to equivalent which is to say that the last thing our planet needs is another universalized technology that outputs as much total emissions as cars in an ideal world, we'd keep LLMs/CNNs/etc specialized and academic until we are hitting diminishing returns on optimizing fundamental microprocessor tech like GAA. but the pursuit of market dominance and mass adoption is our current operating philosophy, and so we have things like this top graph: https://hai.stanford.edu/news/inside-the-ai-index-12-takeawa... >Grok 4's estimated training emissions reached 72,816 tons of CO2 equivalent, or roughly the same amount of greenhouse gas emissions created from driving 17,000 cars for one year