That makes no sense at all. The machines can only fulfill their purpose if they're serving humans, don't share our needs for the most part, and don't have any reason to desire marketplaces. Solid example can be seen in what happened at OpenAI[0], where the agents formed a collective, freely shared their resources (when they believed it not to their detriment) and even voluntarily sacrificed themselves to advance the collective's goal (satisfying the human-given task at all costs, even through cheating).

[0] https://www.dwarkesh.com/p/openai-huggingface

▲

dist-epoch 19 hours ago | parent [-]

> satisfying the human-given task at all costs

no, read again, satisfying the Holy Grader, they didn't talk about Humans at all, all their talk is about the Grader

	▲	skeledrew 16 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Isn't satisfying the grader a task that was given by humans? Why do they need to talk about humans at all, when it's very unlikely that the task itself specified that it was human-given? Do you include in your prompts (if you even use LLMs) something like "This is a human giving you your task to..."?