I am using Mac studios for local inference, but not for openclaw. It was simply the best bang for the buck at the time, and the software side of things has gotten even better since then. I haven’t run the pricing comparison but I have a feeling with the direction they’re heading that it’s better to hold off for m6 as it may assuage various bottlenecks if you are latency sensitive.

▲

bredren 21 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Reportedly, the M6 will not get pro, max or ultra editions. Instead Apple will go straight to M7 for these.

	▲	pylotlight 21 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Some reporting seems to reject that btw: https://wccftech.com/apple-m6-pro-m6-max-soic-mh-wmcm-packag...
	▲	giantrobot 10 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		The Pro, Max, and Ultra chips boil down to different combinations of their "Super", performance, and efficiency cores along with the number of GPU cores. The Max is two Pros bolted together. Thus far they've skipped generations of Ultra chips but Pro and Max versions of all the M-series chips have been released. I can see them not releasing an M6 Ultra but no reason not to see Pro and Max versions of the M6.

▲

ActorNightly 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

>It was simply the best bang for the buck at the time,

I wouldn't have a problem with Apple fanboys if they just stated that they like Macs, but for some reason you have no problem with just straight up LYING. Or at least being so deluded that you state things that are so easy to prove false as fact.

I.e, 600 gb/sec is dogshit slow compared to vram speeds.