I'm glad the authors seem to have acknowledged the problem and not doing much about it :-)

Per the post, the original authors have requested that the original paper be retracted. That’s well above the bar of “not doing much”.

▲

dash2 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Actually the post is ambiguous: did the authors want the original article retracted, or the replication by Hyndman and Bisin? I hope the former!

"Finally, it should be noted that when we shared these posts with Ariely and Wertenbroch a few weeks ago, they reached out to Psychological Science to request that the article be retracted. As of this writing, that process is ongoing."

	▲	fn-mote 4 hours ago \| parent [-]
		The post is unambiguous if you make it to the very end, where there are particular statements from each of the people involved. Look for: > Klaus Wertenbroch […] indicated that he has asked the editor to retract the paper.