| ▲ | BeetleB a day ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
> It was just less of everything than Chrome. This is insane. As a power FF user, I don't think Chrome ever "got ahead". There were 2 reasons for its success (in order): 1. Made by a respected company that was killing everything in those days. 2. It was occasionally faster, and more stable. Feature-wise - it was always worse. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | VCFundedGenYer 11 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
I was also a power FF user at that time. It was not fast. Not at all. Chrome was simply touted as an insanely fast browser. At the time, Firefox was an absolute dog when it came to performance and heaviness. That was enough to win - Chrome kneecapped Firefox over that metric alone. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | brigandish a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
> 2. It was occasionally faster, and more stable. That is ahead for the majority of people. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | dartharva a day ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
3. For a significant period of time (that continues to this day) websites were made using only Chrome as the target platform, turning Firefox into an eternal second fiddle that would occasionally break important/work websites. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||