> when you could run Darwin

That's what this is. Darwin isn't installable today. Apple just dumps a bunch of source code. Previous attempts at making Darwin bootable didn't go far and had no GUI.

▲

gnuplustoejam a day ago | parent [-]

Four years and still pre-alpha. Stick a fork in it.

There's also PureDarwin (?) which had been around forever but last I recall the lone developer was seriously ill and the project was not receiving help. I don't see how this would be any different.

To everyone here cheering this on: when will you be contributing? Or are you just waiting to download it, run it once for the lulz, and drag it to the Trash?

▲

jdiff a day ago | parent [-]

> Four years and still pre-alpha. Stick a fork in it.

Who jammed a toe in your cheerios?

▲

gnuplustoejam a day ago | parent [-]

What will you personally be contributing to the project to help move things along?

Besides accolades on HN of course.

I'm being real here and frankly blind, empty support of open-source projects does zero to support them.

▲

jdiff a day ago | parent | next [-]

I'm actually the head lead developer in chief president. Now, your cheerios?

	▲	cxr a day ago \| parent \| next [-]
		(For those not catching on that the claim was written in jest, the person commenting here is not the creator of this project nor have they committed any code.)
	▲	a day ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		[deleted]

▲

yeko a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Have you taken a look at the source? A lot of code is missing, and more gets redacted with every release. It's pretty clear apple don't welcome contributions and make source buildable

▲

pythonaut_16 a day ago | parent | prev [-]

What? You're the one attacking this project. Or attacking everyone in this thread?

Like seriously, what do you want here? Or are you just mad at everyone and lashing out?