sometimes i feel like the reason nobody ever posts their raw prompts (or at least extremely rarely) is because even though we all know our prompts are not golden geese, they still feel like that in our hands. i'd bet everybody's prompt writing style is like a fingerprint and we all assume they look like our own.

▲

andrewfromx a day ago | parent [-]

totally. https://dontpastetheai.com/ all we want is to stop seeing obvious copy paste. Give me plausible deniability that it's human authored even though we all know nothing is human authored any more.

▲

mannanj a day ago | parent [-]

plenty of content is human authored. the low status ones are not, in my argument.

You could keep pretending that everyones using AI to make low quality or "AI high quality" output but either way, when its obvious its human made, and many humans still write, it will be higher status.

edit: isn't it ironic that that link looks AI generated asking to not share AI generation output

▲

andrewfromx a day ago | parent [-]

^ this one is perfect! Sounds almost 100% human authored.

	▲	mannanj a day ago \| parent [-]
		I wrote this 100% as my human, for my flesh body, Mannan. The one who's thinking of and writing and inspecting these words is the awareness sitting in the human-flesh body for the human named Mannan. no ai at all. I do like how AI does 3 paragraphs though and 3 lines and like uses the number 3 - I had read a book on design and from other sources had been doing this before AI made it popular, but what do I do? stop doing the thing I like? edit: I'm betting that multiples of 3 makes the comment look 1% ai generated lol