> shouldn't we focus on human accessibility first?

This is the big question for designers, how much of the future of software will be human-oriented UIs vs a human typing into a chat window (or as a temporary bridge, telling an agent to operate existing GUIs).

For now I believe agent-driven software is still pretty niche, something for highly technical users, but that will change as it mainstreams. Early adopters demand early adopter software features.

▲

nasso_dev 2 days ago | parent [-]

a chat window is actually HORRIBLE for many tasks. i really strongly hope this isn't what the future of software looks like

there is just no way a chat interface could replace a non-linear video editor gui

▲

phatskat 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

> a chat window is actually HORRIBLE for many tasks. i really strongly hope this isn't what the future of software looks like

I strongly concur - I don't want to "tell" the app to level the audio between several clips only to have it level everything to 0 and then take five minutes to undo etc

	▲	dmix 2 days ago \| parent [-]
		Everyone always views it through the current UX when I say stuff like this. The way I see it is we're in the DOS/UNIX era of LLMs where you're just staring at an empty text input box, it's slow, breaks often, GUI integrations are non-existent or primitive, etc.

▲

dmix 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It's not a replacement for sure. There's no way it could be a full replacement for visual UIs.

▲

_joel 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

I would assume it would be for driving via agentic means, more AI video slop.