| ▲ | ButlerianJihad 3 hours ago | |
For anyone today who's got copper wire stretched between any buildings, you are in danger and your configuration is quite unwise. For every standalone building that has a ground, that building also has an electrical potential. This potential is not necessarily the same between two neighboring buildings. When you stretch a copper line between them, you are tempting fate, electrically, not to mention the dangers of lightning strikes and the elements attacking that connection. It is generally recognized that fiber optics are not only very efficient and durable, but also impervious to electrical troubles of the type that may plague inter-building connections. Simply grab switches or routers that support at least one fiber-optic connection, and link up! | ||
| ▲ | johnwalkr 2 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | |
Ethernet is electrically isolated at every port (unless you really go out of your way in to design it otherwise in an internal design). Your advice is still correct but it's more about lightning or something gone wrong, it's not an immediate risk. | ||
| ▲ | EvanAnderson 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
I did work for a small community college back in the 90s that had expanded their building multiple times since the 70s. The electrical potential between different parts of the building was significant enough to make wired Ethernet unreliable. (I never did understand why this was-- multiple electric service entrances with separate grounds, I assume.) Because of this they were an early adopter of fiber-based networking. I remember being wowed by ATM over fiber running between closets at a blazing 155Mbps (with tons of 10BASE-T clients connected to FORE chassis switches). | ||
| ▲ | lstodd 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Who cared, we were 15 at the time. Besides you worry too much. Entire cities were wired with cat5 hanged off steel cable between 9 to 15 story buildings in early 2000s, before fiber. Nothing burned down. | ||