| ▲ | platesmead 2 days ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Are they counting the loss due to human-induced reduction of biodiversity? E.g. wiping native land and replacing it with houses/cities/roads. Humanity has a cost on nature, that should be mitigated. Humans like domestic cats, which is one contributor to the overall human-induced reduction in biodiversity. I wonder also whether there's something about towns/cities that makes birds flourish, compared to other wild animals. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | Tangurena2 a day ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> I wonder also whether there's something about towns/cities that makes birds flourish, compared to other wild animals. Their predators are more scared of humans, enough to avoid urban areas. Most suburbs are kept in unnatural states with lawns and inedible plants, giving the predators no place to live. Some birds are capable of learning which humans are "safe" and which should be avoided. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | stnikolauswagne 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
>I wonder also whether there's something about towns/cities that makes birds flourish, compared to other wild animals. I would assume it has got do with the reason pigeons are sometimes called "flying rats", i.e. they can subsist on human trash, can survive in the environment and are not seen as negatively as rats and thus have less pest-control efforts pointed at them. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||