|
| ▲ | someguyiguess 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Robots would excel at writing that sort of copy I’d assume. (I haven’t tested it but doubt an LLM couldn’t handle that) |
| |
| ▲ | DoctorOetker an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | "perhaps it would be best to let the browsers do it on screens, and typesetting software for printed materials, since they have access to the font, size, text region boundaries, it comes at the small cost that users don't actually get to read what an author wrote, but increasingly this is an LLM anyways, if its a website or legal contract alike" | |
| ▲ | jobuildsstuff 34 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | [flagged] |
|
|
| ▲ | scott_weber 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| And here I at first thought the direction the original post was going was "here's how I got a LLM to do this automatically". Seems like it would not be so difficult. Might still be be a win over their innate dispositions. |
| |
| ▲ | nvme0n1p1 an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Tom 7 did something like this. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y65FRxE7uMc > BoVeX gives us a controlled tradeoff between these two states. By changing how much it costs for the text to be semantically wrong, we have a dial that allows us to smoothly interpolate between Lorem Epsom and Donald Knuth. | |
| ▲ | an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | [deleted] |
|
