| ▲ | Ylpertnodi 2 days ago | |
> Even building architects will sometimes sue if you photograph the house. ? In the US there's the 1a - you can photograph anything you can see (from a public place). In the there's the assumption you can photograph anything without a 'do not photo, military dogs' etc. Never heard of a non-publishable building. Even gchq can be photo's. | ||
| ▲ | callahad 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | |
Check the "Freedom of Panorama" article on Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_panorama - lots of restrictions around the world. | ||
| ▲ | kube-system 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
> In the US there's the 1a - you can photograph anything you can see (from a public place). Just because you can photograph it does not mean you can necessarily publish it. IP rights are a recognized exception to the 1a | ||
| ▲ | 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
| [deleted] | ||
| ▲ | prmoustache 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Taking photos and publishing photos are 2 different things. The first one doesn't involve copyright for a start. | ||