I like claude code, I use it quite a bit for things, and I don't mind the attribution (I do not plan to deceive people of me using AI or not for a change) and I think a link back to the session is valueable after the fact. At least for me, the session contains a lot of discussion, back and forth, changes from me and more. (Also, if the feature is not on by default, it probably might not exist.)

However, I think claude code needs better change management. It changes quite frequent and I think changes like these should be communicated better in software. (Like a card game may show card changes in game when a patch happened.) It may impact how I do things when creating the commit messages or PRs.

> That is a stupid and evil feature.

I can see arguments for "stupid", but "evil"?

▲

eli a day ago | parent | next [-]

Seems plausible that the feature was only added (quietly and by default) for marketing reasons

	▲	lawrjone a day ago \| parent [-]
		It’s really useful for helping agents navigate history and maintain continuity between sessions. So wouldn’t assume it’s for marketing, it has a lot of utility.

▲

verdverm a day ago | parent | prev [-]

> However, I think claude code needs better change management.

Ant is a slop factory and proud about it, you only have to listen to their people talk. Their products are buggy and inconsistent in features, so I don't use them.