Where did I say you can't do that? I answered you why I assumed the original comment was leaning towards JIT for everything.

▲

daishi55 3 days ago | parent [-]

Ok so if it is indeed possible to verify the code after JIT generating it, I still don’t understand why you would assume that in the hypothetical scenario we aren’t doing that verification?

You literally said it can’t be JIT, I’m just saying it seems like it can.

	▲	mihaelm 3 days ago \| parent [-]
		Again, I answered that in the earlier reply: > Since the comment is talking about using more & more JIT for security reasons, I assumed it extended to verification too. I wouldn't consider feeding the JIT-ed code to a JIT-ed verifier code proper verification. Even ignoring the verification bit, I don't see the security benefits of having agents write JIT code, hence the original question. Because there might be some edge cases I don't know about, but I can't see this applying generally.