I cancelled my subscription over this [1].

1: https://x.com/m_herrmann/status/2092579839676948495

Interesting. Can you elaborate on why you feel strongly about this? It's easily removable--I don't think your characterization that it "forces" attribution is correct, it just defaults it.

	▲	benatkin 16 hours ago \| parent [-]
		It's deliberately hostile, in the way that Facebook is to its userbase. I guess Claude doesn't have nearly the grip on their users that Facebook does. Facebook can make it hard to communicate with (via WhatsApp) or stay connected with some of your friends or relatives, while Claude can just make you use the second-best model for cheaper (if Fable is the best).

▲

benatkin a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Indeed, the disclaiming of it being human-coded isn't the problem with their commit messages, them using it as a growth hack mechanism is. BTW to say it's attributed to Claude, I don't give that much importance, but I think it's useful to other coders to know what model was used. A simple assisted by AI would mostly handle the plaigiarism problem, because Claude's training data didn't come from Claude.

▲

felixgallo a day ago | parent | prev [-]

who cares?

	▲	piker a day ago \| parent [-]
		Some people who are in this thread might be interested in that view. A little more context would have helped it though I agree.