Remix.run Logo
steve1977 a day ago

> The company has committed major marketing blunders by giving itself a creepy vibe, which is a well-deserved reputation, down to the very name of the company. These errors are unnecessary and unforced self-sabotage.

I'm pretty sure this was very intentional and not a marketing blunder in any way.

It has long been a shtick of Alex Karp to be vague in answering questions where and how Palantir software is used.

I also don't think you can put Thiel and Musk, or rather Palantir and Tesla, in the same bucket here.

Tesla wants and needs to sell to common people. Palantir doesn't.

helsinkiandrew a day ago | parent [-]

> Tesla wants and needs to sell to common people. Palantir doesn't.

But common people are also employees[1], voters[2] and shareholders[3] and are getting increasingly vocal:

[1] https://www.linkedin.com/posts/sandyacarter_with-ai-trust-is...

[2] https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2026/jul/09/mps-urge-la...

[3] https://www.barrons.com/articles/palantir-stock-price-human-...

etempleton a day ago | parent | next [-]

It is a risky strategy but if people believe they are creepy they believe they are powerful.

steve1977 a day ago | parent | prev [-]

But from what I understand

[1] USA Today is still using Palantir

[2] This might have an effect in 2027 or it might not

[3] The majority of shareholders still voted against that proposal

So in the end, these people getting vocal has pretty much no real effect.