They appear (I skimmed) to be investing in all any feasible ideas to capture CO2 from the air - this is a good thing.

The numbers are daunting and the returns are scant, but the effort is one that should be made.

The upside is I saw little sign of Gorgan LNG style Carbon Capture; where a massive source of CO2 greenwashes releasing 100 units of CO2 by stuffing 1 unit back in the hole it came from.

▲

dylan604 a day ago | parent [-]

For every ton of CO2 pulled from the air is another ton that something else will emit. Once the emitting is lowered, pulling it out of the air might have a chance

▲

sobkas a day ago | parent | next [-]

CO2 capture produces more green house gases than it captures

https://www.cnbc.com/2022/01/24/shell-ccs-facility-in-canada...

	▲	defrost a day ago \| parent [-]
		That's more of the "Gorgan LNG style Carbon Capture" I noted above - that's "capture" in the sense of releasing massive amounts of CO2 to the atmosphere while extracting massive amounts of natural gas .. but "making up for it" by not letting quite all of it escape and pushing a bit back. Dubious accounting trick at best .. not even working as it was sold on the box in practice. Atmospheric CO2 already floating about appears to be what the air-mining crowd are targeting (albeit small scale so far).

▲

defrost a day ago | parent | prev [-]

The strategy is to walk and chew gum.