| ▲ | kuschku a day ago | |
Regarding the differentiated branding, I've been hoping for a GrapheneLite for many years now. Regarding direct AOSP support, there are many devices that work fine with just the generic system image, which I'd count as direct AOSP support. | ||
| ▲ | ysnp 15 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
As far as I understand, broad device support is a non-goal for the GrapheneOS project. They are striving for decent security/privacy rather than wanting to attach their name and resources to mediocre standards. I believe nothing prevents other individuals and organisations from building what you're suggesting with GrapheneOS code and ideas. | ||
| ▲ | drabbiticus 16 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
I would argue that "works fine" != "direct support" when discussing vendors and platforms. Support is a commitment signal, not just a technical capability. | ||