Yes. "High confidence." I confirmed it myself:

> https://i.ibb.co/m5tPKPYS/Screenshot2026829-1.png

But forget Pangram. This passage, from the conclusion, is 100% rock-solid proof that Claude was a key contributor.

> "The question is not whether the internet contains useful things. It does. The question is whether human existence should be organised around alien and inhuman objective functions no human chose and nobody can inspect or understand."

Also, I think that "grift" (repeated throughout the article) is very poorly defined. I also think that most cryptocurrencies are, in the general case, a bad example of a "grift."

▲

chrisjj a day ago | parent [-]

Grift poorly defined? https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/grift

	▲	A_D_E_P_T a day ago \| parent [-]
		But this guy's talking about drop-shippers, life coaches, cryptocurrency, online "influencing" in general, and other things. Very few of those fit your own definition, as there's nothing illicit involved. In some cases, e.g. if you compare cryptocurrency to drop-shipping, there's not even much common ground, except "markets things through social media."