On a similar note, is there any distro that explicitly has banned usage of generative AI for their project? Asking for a friend.

▲

phyzix5761 a day ago | parent | next [-]

The problem is you can't prove if AI was used or not so Debian's response is actually the most logical one. If anyone uses AI they're still responsible for what they submit.

▲

doublerabbit a day ago | parent [-]

What happens when the AI submitted code has been submitted by AI, Who's then responsible?

▲

tredre3 a day ago | parent [-]

Whoever controls the AI, as per the article we're discussing.

Debian isn't a free-for-all, they don't accept fly-by-night contributions, there needs to be a real and serious person behind every contribution.

	▲	doublerabbit 4 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Folk get's lazy, it'll will only be a matter of time. Ai controlling Ai, deep fakes are deep fakes.

▲

tinkelenberg a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

OpenBSD seems to have this stance.

Source: https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=177425035627562&w=2

	▲	sph a day ago \| parent [-]
		Might be time for me to give it a serious go

▲

TiredOfLife 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I will take a guess and say every systemd-less one

▲

GalaxyNova a day ago | parent | prev [-]

Gentoo, Guix, a few others