Do you have an example of a maliciously-complying website? Virtually all remotely popular websites deliberately use unnecessary cookies.

▲

yencabulator a day ago | parent [-]

Wanting to use unnecessary cookies is their choice, not something a law forced on them.

Non-malicious compliance with privacy laws would mean respecting people's privacy.

▲

beej71 a day ago | parent [-]

Maybe I'm ignorant of the gdpr, but does it ban tracking cookies?

▲

yencabulator a day ago | parent [-]

You might be ignorant on purpose. The law does not mention cookies at all, it says how personal/private information must be handled, and under what conditions collecting such is permissible.

▲

beej71 15 hours ago | parent [-]

Yes, but this exchange is in the context of cookies, as you brought up in your comment. And we're talking about companies maliciously complying with the cookie pop-up mechanism, are we not?

	▲	maccard 14 hours ago \| parent [-]
		The cookie pop up is a response to the ePrivacy directive, not GDPR.