| ▲ | charcircuit 21 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
>democracy, per se, includes minority protections (i. e. if it doesn't then it isn't a democracy to begin with). Democracy has nothing to do with minority protections. I don't understand you can say it per se includes minority protections. Democracy includes whatever enough people think it should include. If people don't want such protections then there is no need for them. If a democratic society does not want to live side by side violent murderers and thugs they can agree on ways to deal with that minority group like killing them or imprisoning them. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | spankibalt 20 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
> Democracy has nothing to do with minority protections. [...] Democracy includes whatever enough people [italized by me] think it should include. If people don't want such protections then there is no need for them. You just proved my point by demonstrating your utter ignorance of the topic: Your three sentences encapsulate the textbook definition of ochlocracy (or laocracy), i. e. mob rule. Which, as already outlined, is not democracy. I suggest you read some authoritative and up-to-date texts on democracy before embarassing yourself again. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||