I do like Zed as an editor and I keep trying it out

but the the review what the AI did by jumping directly into the file with accept/reject/go next/next file with the ability to edit in place was nowhere near as good in zed vs cursor last I checked.

▲

hn_throw2025 a day ago | parent | next [-]

I recently cancelled Cursor.

The features you mention are in Antigravity IDE v1, which I am trying as I still have a Gemini subscription.

No idea how long it will be around for, as Google Antigravity2 (more like Claude Code) is clearly the favoured way forward, plus the new Antigravity for VSCode Extension*, which I didn’t like as much when I tried it. It offers the same accept/reject hunk workflow, but I don’t know about editing in place. It doesn’t feel as if it has the tight integration of Antigravity IDE v1, which feels as if it was designed to challenge Cursor.

Having said that, much of the time I use Google Antigravity2 alongside a Jetbrains IDE. You can still review all diffs within Google Antigravity2 and attach comments to any line on order for a followup prompt to make amendments. But I still prefer the review and accept/reject hunk workflow.

* https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=Google.g...

▲

jackjeff a day ago | parent [-]

Thanks for the feedback. I’ve been trying to cancel my cursor subscription but I always come back. ;)

	▲	hn_throw2025 a day ago \| parent [-]
		You’re welcome… There are things I will probably miss from Cursor, as they used to iterate on DX goodies quite quickly. For frontend tasks, I liked the idea of Cursor Browser being able to do a devtools-like selection of an element tree to be included in the chat context. I’ve been told there are similar extensions available for vanilla VSCode, so will have to see how good they are.

▲

flaburgan a day ago | parent | prev [-]

They improve super fast though, releasing a new version every week. If you have specific improvements in mind open an issue on their github.