> and he actually shot a police officer during their "protest."

He did not, he shot at an officer and missed. He was also the only one of the protestors that shot.

You dispute that the officer was shot in the neck?

	▲	cogman10 21 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Yes, because no evidence of the injury was presented at trial other than the officer's testimony. If he was shot in the neck, why didn't the prosecution show a photo of the wound? Why are his neck and shoulder injuries a privacy concern? What they proved is that shots were fired and that the officer involved was fine and walking around the scene after the shooting. When he said "I'm hit" another officer checked on video and said "your good your good your good".