> We are making this choice because we cannot be confident that SpaceX will use our technology within our terms of service, based on our experience with Elon Musk's companies violating contracts.

> After Musk acquired Twitter, now part of SpaceX, the company broke (opens in a new window) the terms of our contract (alongside many others).

I have never seen one large company throw another large company under the bus without any legalese filters like this before. Wondering if OpenAI site got pwned. Or maybe we in some strange, alternative reality. I doubt even their LLMs would be this frank.

▲

AirMax98 a day ago | parent | next [-]

And to announce it on a Friday night. Brutal.

▲

the_real_cher a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Sam and Elon have a long standing feud. This is more than just bad blood between companies.

▲

skeledrew a day ago | parent [-]

Still, where's the legalese? I'd expect something like this on an individual's blog, not a company's.

▲

mikeyouse a day ago | parent [-]

They can skip the legalese because Musk had testified under oath that Grok was distilling OpenAI models while Elon was on the board of OpenAI.

https://www.theverge.com/ai-artificial-intelligence/921546/e...

	▲	293725903 17 hours ago \| parent [-]
		[dead]

▲

Palmik a day ago | parent | prev [-]

Elon Musk openly admitted to distilling OpenAI's models during his lawsuit against OpenAI. [1]

[1] https://www.forbes.com/sites/antoniopequenoiv/2026/04/30/elo...