They are technicalities, because the intent of the law is clean air. A carve out for temporary generators is clearly not intended to allow megawatts of permanent generation to operate outside of the regulatory umbrella and abuse of it is allowing the rich to skate by on a technicality.

▲

rayiner 9 hours ago | parent [-]

> They are technicalities, because the intent of the law is clean air.

That’s not how laws work, especially the Clean Air Act. “There are no solutions. There are only tradeoffs.” (https://ozgengungor.medium.com/one-of-those-quotes-thomas-so...).

The Clean Air Act was not designed to achieve cleaner air at any cost, but instead to achieve targeted pollution control that would have the greatest value at acceptable cost. The modern structure of the act was set in place in 1970 under Nixon, and is full of legislative compromises to balance incremental benefits to air quality against burden on industry.

	▲	solid_fuel 4 hours ago \| parent [-]
		> The Clean Air Act was not designed to achieve cleaner air at any cost You will notice we are not talking "at any cost". We are talking about a very specific cost to AI hyperscalers. > full of legislative compromises to balance incremental benefits to air quality against burden on industry. These technicalities are being exploited for the benefit of approximately 10 people, and to the detriment of everyone else. Your talking points are old and exhausted.