> We're nowhere near a Fable-class model IMO, but things are going to get interesting in this next year.

I'm wondering of you could clarify your thoughts on this. I've had a hard time evaluating what Fable-class actually is capable of that sets them (or really it) apart from other models in a very significant way.

▲

lukan 13 hours ago | parent [-]

Have you tried it out? I doubt there is a general accepted definition. For me it is just more capable of deep reasoning/handling complexity. Still can mess up, still does not count as strong AI - but a level above Opus and co.

	▲	mtrovo 6 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Could you give me an example of a similar task you asked Fable and a different model to do where Fable did a better job? I have a hard time getting models like GLM 5.3 to not perform on my tasks but I might be biased.