| ▲ | z3c0 4 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
Using AI to close gaps in accessibility is like adding treads to your vehicle because society is too lazy to pave roads. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | stillpointlab 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
I think people outside of enterprise have no idea the cost to audit and fix a massive website. The law is a forcing function here. Lawsuits can and do happen when sites of a certain size fail to implement government-mandated laws. This is a good thing, IMO, but it only comes into force in the largest cases. If there is a credible path to 1/10th the cost (while still providing liability insurance which is a critical piece) then that will likely encourage more enterprise to do it proactively, and will open the door for startups and mid-sized companies. I have no idea why anyone would choose to see this as bad. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | MrJohz 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
I think they were suggesting using AI to audit for accessibility, which is probably a better approach, and probably more effective than a lot of the basic accessibility checkers out there that work on a list of fairly simple rules and don't understand the context of what they're doing, so tend to give either very limited advice, or sometimes even offer bad advice. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | nonethewiser 27 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Well isn’t it like asking the AI to pave roads? | |||||||||||||||||