| ▲ | mullingitover 2 days ago | |||||||||||||||||||
Recent WIRED[1] article goes in depth on this exact problem: > Another prompt instructs the system to list everyone arrested more than twice in two years for “any offense,” exempting only narcotics arrests, and then says to map where those people live, retrieve the calls for service at their homes, and “do a workup on the top three individuals.” The prompt begins with everyone in the area who has an arrest record and ends with dossiers on three of them, chosen by the software. > A “workup,” in Flock’s terminology, is a one-command background check. It starts with a name and a date of birth and returns what the department’s records and commercial data hold: vehicles, prior listings as a suspect, and, on a second screen, relatives, phone numbers, and online accounts. This stuff is beyond the wildest fantasies of East Germany's Stasi, and it's going to be a whack-a-mole game dealing with all the baby Flocks that spring up if Flock itself can be shut down. [1] https://www.wired.com/story/flock-safety-os-investigate/ | ||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | Gigachad 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||
For a more modern example, China already has this and a lot more. The public seems largely supportive of it though because most street crimes stopped. The potential for abuse is obviously massive, but the benefit to society is too. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | legitster 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||
> This stuff is beyond the wildest fantasies of East Germany's Stasi I feel like that's a bit of a false equivalency. The soviet secret police had surprisingly little hard evidence on anyone - part of the terror of these regimes is that they could act decisively with little more than a rumor or gossip and be free from scrutiny for any mistakes. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | dmitrygr 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||
> everyone arrested more than twice in two years Purely statistically, this is a good first-pass filter if you are looking for perps. Chance a random adult is arrested in a 8-year window: ~5%. Chance a former convict gets arrested in an 8-year window: ~49%. So, it is ~10x the rate. Makes sense, statistically, to start there. https://www.ussc.gov/research/research-reports/recidivism-am... | ||||||||||||||||||||