[flagged]

Is there any indication or proof that they are providing services to PKK? Equating supporting protest organizers in the west with supporting an armed terrorist group is laughable and dangerous.

▲

32aGh 2 days ago | parent [-]

If you search for "noblogs pkk" you find a handful, literally less than 10, of pro PKK links, all of which have been taken down.

Could have been a false flag to discredit antifa. What happened to safe harbor?

▲

hexator 2 days ago | parent [-]

Having "pro-PKK views" (or for other groups designated as terrorists for that matter) is not against the law in the US as that is a first amendment right (as long as that speech is not support).

	▲	inigyou 14 hours ago \| parent [-]
		The first amendment only applies to US citizens and residents. The US is allowed to stifle the speech of anyone else.